USPTO serial 74358770
CAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Friedl
JOHN FRIEDL HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN2290 FIRST NATIONAL BLDGDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services; namely, money market accounts, credit card services, and securities brokerage services | ABANDONED | Apr 19, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |