USPTO serial 74358925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
OHIO MATTRESS COMPANY LICENSING AND COMPONENTS GROUP, THE
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by OHIO MATTRESS COMPANY LICENSING AND COMPONENTS GROUP, THE
OHIO MATTRESS COMPANY LICENSING AND COMPONENTS GROUP, THE
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by OHIO MATTRESS COMPANY LICENSING AND COMPONENTS GROUP, THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Oremland
RAYMOND RUNDELLI CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLPSTE 1400800 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2688| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | mattresses and box springs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |