USPTO serial 74358946
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2207789Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 1998
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3AB, England, GB
TW9 3AB, GB
TW9 3AB, GB
TW9 3AB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
RONALD E SHAPIRO MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC1751 PINNACLE DRSTE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ history, botany, horticulture and botanical art books, guides and pamphlets; annual diaries; calendars; address books; telephone books; visitors books for signatures and comments of visitors; day books in the form of a diary without a specific year; botanical prints; posters; notecards; note paper; postcards; notebooks; bookmarks; gift wrap; gift cards; greeting cards; colored pencils; non-colored pencils; ball point pens; ink pens; felt tip pens; pencil cases; pen pots; ring-binder files; loose-leaf folders; writing paper ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ tea services consisting of cups, saucers, plates, serving dishes, teapots, jugs, bowls; dinner services consisting of cups, saucers, plates, serving dishes, teapots, jugs, bowls; glassware consisting of drinking glasses, jugs, bowls, vases, candlesticks, figurines, statuettes; ceramics consisting of commemorative plates, dishes, vases, candlesticks, figurines, statuettes; household ornaments made of china, porcelain, and earthenware; earthenware, china, and ceramic plaques; and enamel boxes ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | tea towels; textile serviettes; textile table cloths; curtains; cushion covers; bed linen; cloth place mats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RBG KEW ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS KEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |