USPTO serial 74358995
FRIG EWE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIG EWE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Bergen, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | envelopes, stationery, bumper stickers, posters, greeting cards and compact disc, audio tape and video tape and video tape covers, unmounted photographs, mounted photographs, stationery, comic books, humorous books, cookbooks | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | T-shirts, hats, jackets, pants, shorts, sneakers, socks, bandannas and sweatbands, hats, T-shirts, jackets | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | board games, computer games and inflatable rafts, stuffed toy animals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |