Drawing for 3-DIMENSIONAL SERVICES

USPTO serial 74359172

3-DIMENSIONAL SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3-DIMENSIONAL SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Sprinkle

DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD, GROH, SPRINKLE, PATMORE, ET AL280 N WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042engineering services; namely, stereolithography, rapid prototyping and CAD/CAM generated solid modelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 29, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 10, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 5, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 21, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 1, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance