USPTO serial 74359783
AQUA DE LUZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUA DE LUZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert C. Ross
HERBERT C ROSS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, toilet water, skin soaps, toilet soaps, deodorant soaps; bath and shower additives; namely, bath and shower gels, essential oils for persoanl use, bath oils, and non-medicated bath salts; non-medicated sunscreens, suntan lotions, and after-sun lotions, antiperspirants, deodorants for personal use; preparations for body and beauty care; namely, rouge, eyebrow pencils, eye shadow, mascara, lipstick; non-medicated lotions and creams; namely, hand, face, body and skin lotions and creams; facial moisturizing masks, face and body powders, facial scrubs; non-medicated hair preparations; namely, shampoo conditioner, hair lotion, and hair gel; deplilatory agents, shaving creams, shaving foams, aftershave lotions; skin cleaning preparations; namely, clear, creamy and whipped cleansers, toners, and fresheners, gels, scrubs and cleansing masks; nail polish and nail polish remover, dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |