USPTO serial 74360023
STREET COMBAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STREET COMBAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nishiku, Osaka 550, JP
Nishiku, Osaka 550, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan M. Lowe
ALLAN M LOWE LOWE, PRICE, LEBLANC & BECKER99 CANAL CTR PLZALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | hand-held electronic game machines; video game machines adapted for use with television or with video display units; coin-operated game machines having a video display, and computer game programs | ABANDONED | Apr 29, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |