Drawing for HOLLY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.

USPTO serial 74360432

HOLLY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1899447Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 1995
Examiner
LEVY, MICHAEL S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HOLLY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036provision of services in connection with rental housing; namely, the rental of apartments, the leasing of real estate, real estate management, and land acquisition and disposal; namely, real estate brokerage servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 8, 1993
037real estate developmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 8, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2002C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 13, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 1995CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 1995CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance