USPTO serial 74360614
WRANGLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WRANGLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE WILLKIE, FARR & GALLGHERONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022-4677Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, shorts, jogging suits, warm-ups, jackets, sweaters, pants, ponchos, visors, raincoats, hats, caps, cloth bibs, sweatshirts, wristbands, scarves, and bandanas used to promote a professional baseball team | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |