USPTO serial 74360906
NEOPARA ACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEOPARA ACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanford W. Berman
STANFORD W BERMAN FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical preparations for use as dehumidifying agents, moisture proofing agents and desiccants | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | household fungiproofing agents, household fungicides; sanitary napkins, sanitary pads; aromatic preparations, namely air deodorants, air freshners; preparations for destroying vermin; insecticides for domestic and agricultural use; dietary food supplements for invalids, medical plasters, surgical bandages, bandages for skin wounds, dental wax, dental amalgams; preparations for killing weeds, and repellents for insects, dogs and birds | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.T. KAGAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by S.T. KAGAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NEOPARA ACE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |