USPTO serial 74361085
NATURE'S BASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE'S BASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chocolate and chocolate products; namely, chocolate, chocolate cakes and pies, chocolate fillings for cakes and pies, chocolate chips, chocolate candy, chocolate crackers, chocolate snacks, and hot chocolate; sweets; namely, bakery goods, biscuits, buns, cakes, candied fruits, candies, cheesecake, crumpets, custards, dougnuts, pastries, tarts, frozen yogurts, ice cream, gum, and pies; cereal based food bar, cereal based snack foods, bran, cereals, flour, wheat germ, and cereal based additives for non-nutritional purposes as flavorings, ingredients, or fillers; oatmeal, pancakes, bread, waffles, gingerbread, noodles, tea and coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |