USPTO serial 74361429
MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richardson, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald L. Smith
GERALD L SMITH MUELLER AND SMITH, LPAMUELLER-SMITH BLDG7700 RIVERS EDGE DRCOLUMBUS, OH 43235Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic kilowatthour meters | ABANDONED | Oct 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |