USPTO serial 74361489
HEART HEALTHY WEIGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEART HEALTHY WEIGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas B. Hobbes
THOMAS B HOBBES MALONEY & BURCH3000 CONNECTICUT AVE N WP O BOX 42419WASHINGTON, DC 20015-0419Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational programs, namely conducting courses of instruction in cardiovascular fitness by means of weight loss management, the channels of trade for which programs are limited to promotional materials and advertising distributed solely to the clientele of applicant's club and resort facilities, either within the confines of the facilities themselves, or in mailings directed specifically toward members of that clientele | ABANDONED | Oct 31, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |