Drawing for GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION GOVTECH

USPTO serial 74361532

GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION GOVTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHO, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION GOVTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irving A. Lavine

IRVING A LAVINE NATH, LAMBERT & AMBERLY1835 K ST NW STE 750WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035arranging and conducting trade shows relating to computer equipment and suppliesABANDONEDJun 25, 1993
041arranging and conducting conferences and seminars relating to computer equipment and suppliesABANDONEDJun 25, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 12, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 1993AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 7, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance