Drawing for THE GOURMET BAKER

USPTO serial 74362002

THE GOURMET BAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1896358Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 1995
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE GOURMET BAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carlo F. Van den Bosch

Carlo F. Van den Bosch Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP650 Town Center DriveFourth FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030frozen bakery products; namely, croissants, crumpets, Danish pastry, puff pastry, muffins, muffin batters, [ buns, ] cakes, sheet cakes, tortes, [ dumplings, bagels, pies and pie wedges ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 8, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 24, 200589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jan 18, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 200489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Dec 29, 2004E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 9, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 30, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance