USPTO serial 74362022
Serial No. 74362022
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74362022?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Iandiorio
JOSEPH S IANDIORIO IANDIORIO & DINGMAN260 BEAR HILL RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | olive oil, cheese, chicken broth, processed olives, processed lupini, artichoke salad, marinated artichokes, marinated mushroom, roasted peppers, processed sweet garlic peppers, pepper salad, processed hot crushed peppers, processed red sliced peppers, processed green sliced peppers, processed sweet whole peppers, processed hot cherry peppers, processed sweet banana peppers, processed hot finger peppers, processed hot pepper rings, slice hot peppers in oil, processed sweet stuffed peppers, processed hot stuffed peppers, processed jalapeno peppers, hot garden salad, giardieniera, sardines, mackerel, clams not live for human consumption, anchovies, processed peas, processed beans, processed tomatoes, tomatoes paste, stewed tomatoes, tomato puree, tonno | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1994 |
| 030 | pesto, meat sauce, meatless sauce, mushroom sauce, marinara sauce, red clam sauce, white clam sauce, pizza sauce, coffee, vinegar, vinaigrette dressing, parmesan dressing, bread crumbs, rice, spaghetti, spaghettini, linguine, mezze linguine, capellini, noodles, ziti rigati, mezze ziti, fusilli, rigatoni, pasta shells, ditali, stelline, sedano, elbow pasta, farfalle, mostaccioli, spiral tri color and pastina | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1994 |
| 031 | unprocessed olives, fresh peas, fresh beans, fresh tomatoes | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pastene Companies Ltd., The
- Other trademarks owned by Pastene Companies Ltd., The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |