USPTO serial 74362057
CAMERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAMERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert Robin
330 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | management and security surveillance apparatus and event monitoring apparatus; namely, video tape recorders, video multiplexing switchers, point-of-sale video event monitoring systems, quad splitting switches, closed circuit television monitors, camera control equipment and cameras | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair services, all relating to management and security apparatus and event monitoring apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | leasing of management and security apparatus and event monitoring apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |