USPTO serial 74362560
CYRENE-Z
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYRENE-Z?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Garrett
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY ST STE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non medicated topical preparations for skin care | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |