USPTO serial 74362760
GRUNES KREUZ CROCE VERDE CROIX-VERTE GREEN CROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRUNES KREUZ CROCE VERDE CROIX-VERTE GREEN CROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
59100 Roubaix, FR
59100 Roubaix, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR1225 EYE ST N W STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telephone communication services; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | publication of books; entertainment; namely, production of motion picture films, theater plays and record master; distribution of motion picture films; development and dissemination of educational materials in the field of ecology for others; organizing and conducting educational conferences, colloquy and congresses in the field of ecology; organizing and conducting cultural and educational exhibitions relating to ecology, organizing and conducting classes and workshops relating to training to avoid ecological disasters to cope with major risk, crisis or ecological catastrophe | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | news agencies; namely, gathering and dissemination of news; engineering services in the field of prevention or reduction of risks, crises and ecological catastrophes and avoidance of ecological disasters; consulting services in the field of ecology; medical laboratories; research services in the field of bacteriology, chemistry, cosmetology, genealogy, mechanics and geology | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REDOUTE CATALOGUE
- Other trademarks owned by REDOUTE CATALOGUE
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GRUNES KREUZ CROCE VERDE CROIX-VERTE GREEN CROSS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |