USPTO serial 74362978
ULTRACHART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRACHART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA RUSSELL-BROWN
PATRICIA RUSSELL-BROWN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES767 FITH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in creating graphs and analyzing market data | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 1992 |
| 036 | computerized financial information services in the field of data regarding all types of financial instruments and markets, indices and statistics relating thereto | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |