USPTO serial 74362998
OBODEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OBODEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph C. Mason, Jr.
JOSEPH C MASON JR MANGROVE BAY OFFICE CTRMASON & ASSOCIATES PA17757 U S HWY 19 N STE 500CLEARWATER, FL 34624Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and auxiliary equipment; namely, personal computers, notebook personal computers, network computer systems comprising docking station and network cards, computer peripherals and parts thereof; and computer operating software and manuals sold together as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1996 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |