USPTO serial 74363051
REMMY AWARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REMMY AWARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy V. Hoyt
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | promoting public awareness of the need for good dental hygiene and to provide incentives to people to achieve the same by means of award programs | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |