USPTO serial 74363301
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond, B.C. V6V 2V4, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 3Y3, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 3Y3, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. O'CONNOR
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital photographic cameras | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |