Drawing for REGENT PACIFIC GROUP

USPTO serial 74363364

REGENT PACIFIC GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGENT PACIFIC GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Bridges

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATITWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035accounting services; acquisition and merger consultation services; market analysis services; business appraisal services; business auditing services; business consultation services; operation of a business for others; business information services; business investigations; business management services; business management planning, assistance, and supervision; commercial and industrial management assistance services; business crisis consultation servicesABANDONED—
036investment consultation; capital formation consultation services; cash management services; financial analysis and consultation services; debt restructuring analysis and consultation services; financial portfolio management services; financial valuation services; fiscal assessment and valuation services; consultation services to creditors regarding insolvency and workouts; business turnaround consultation servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance