Drawing for THE BISMUTH CARTRIDGE COMPANY NO-TOX

USPTO serial 74363410

THE BISMUTH CARTRIDGE COMPANY NO-TOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1833780Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 1994
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE BISMUTH CARTRIDGE COMPANY NO-TOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA M. MERRITT

LINDA M MERRITT FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP2200 ROSS AVESTE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013shotgun shells and shot for making shotgun shellsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 13, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2015C8.TCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)—
Apr 14, 2010CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2004RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 8, 200489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 9, 2003PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jul 11, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jul 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 2, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 3, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 2, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance