USPTO serial 74363627
PENATRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENATRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Deits
DAVID H DEITS SEED & BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | drill bits, forstner bits, spade bits, auger bits, glass bits, cordless drill bits, masonry drill bits, brad point bits and insta-chuck drill clutches, all for power operated tools | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |