Drawing for FRESCO DE RANCHO

USPTO serial 74363643

FRESCO DE RANCHO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESCO DE RANCHO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD B SHELDON JR

RICHARD B SHELDON JR MITCHELL SILBERGERG & KNUPP LLPTRIDENT CTR11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cheeseACTIVEOct 20, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 26, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 16, 1994LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 1, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 1994LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 2, 1994CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 3, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 7, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance