USPTO serial 74363653
NAUGHTY BUT NICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAUGHTY BUT NICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NATURAL BEAUTY PRODUCTS LIMITED
Mid Glamorgan, South Wales, CF31 3RT, GB
NATURAL BEAUTY PRODUCTS LIMITED
Mid Glamorgan, South Wales, CF31 3RT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome S. Marger
JEROME S MARGER MARGER, JOHNSON, MCCOLLOM, ET AL650 AMERICAN BANK BLDG621 S W MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet preparations; namely, skin moisturizers, skin cleansing lotions and creams, day skin cream, night skin cream, skin toner, cleansing face masks; non-medicated suntanning preparations; nail care preparations for reinforcing and strengthening nails; preparations for use in the bath; namely, bath gels; shower foams; toilet soaps; non-medicated body-toning preparations; cosmetics; namely, foundations, eye shadows, makeup powders, blushers, eye crayons, mascara, and lipstick; eau de cologne; toilet waters; essential oils for personal use; hair lotions; hair shampoos; hair gels; anti-perspirants; deodorants for personal use; dentifrices; depilatories; eye make-up remover, nail polish; nail base coat; nail varnish remover; non-medicated cuticle lotions; nail revitalizing lotions; bronzing creams | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |