USPTO serial 74363958
DE-TOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUPO, ANTHONY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DE-TOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William T. Hough
WILLIAM T HOUGH LIBERTY CORNERP O BOX 326LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | orally administered anti-oxidants; namely, a combination of vitamins C and E with beta-carotene, for treatment of arterial lipoprotein particles against oxidation with electronically charged free-radical oxygen in the blood stream, to avoid production of cholesterol-laden plague foam cells | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |