USPTO serial 74364101
RAGFEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 1996
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAGFEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
Saint Charles, MO
CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
Saint Charles, MO
CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
Saint Charles, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Annette P. Heller
ANNETTE P HELLER14323 S OUTER FORTY DRSTE 512 STOWN & COUNTRY, MO 63107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a live musical performance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OF SAINT CHARLES, MISSOURI
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RAGFEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |