USPTO serial 74364350
W WESCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with W WESCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
F79 140 Cerizay, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
FRANCIS J DUFFIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | gymnastic, sport and physical education articles for children; namely, foam mats; foam modules in various geometric shapes; trampolines; riged plastic poles, hoops, rings and bricks; polyurethane balloons for coordination and body movement awareness; ribbons for dance and rhythm; rigid plastic clubs for skill and balancing beams; pennants; flags; field markers; orientation signs; fillable bases; markers; poles, volleyballs; basketballs; footballs; handballs; rugby balls; p.v.c. jumping balloons; balancing discs; soft texture balls and rubber balls; foam pools; buoyancy aids; oscillating discs; egg style flips; floating rings; floats and kickboards, floating discs; diving poles; diving rings; climbing nets; climbing benches; climbing frames and walls; hockey sticks; field hockey sticks; field hockey training ballls and pucks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |