USPTO serial 74364408
ROAD EATERS JUST FOR KIDS STOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROAD EATERS JUST FOR KIDS STOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George D. Dickos
GEORGE D DICKOS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP1500 OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys; namely, miniature cars and trucks | ABANDONED | May 3, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Majorette Toys (U.S.) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Majorette Toys (U.S.) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROAD EATERS JUST FOR KIDS STOP
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |