USPTO serial 74364728
CARDFONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDFONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET STSTE 1630SAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic data terminals, telephones, and data communications devices which accept smart cards, credit cards and debit cards and other authorization devices, for performing ATM transactions, processing and transferring credit and debit card transactions, payments and financial data, and other information presented thereto, and for use with on-line services, data communications systems, home banking, home shopping, transaction processing systems, point-of-sale systems, point-of-service systems and financial transaction information and approval systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |