USPTO serial 74364729
SMARTCASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTCASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE55 S MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically, optically or electronically encoded cards; namely, smart cards, credit cards and debit cards, and point of sale transaction terminals for use with electronic data terminals, telephones, and data communications devices for performing ATM transactions, processing and transferring credit and debit card transactions, payments and financial data, and other information presented thereto, and for use with on-line services, data communications systems, home banking, home shopping, transaction processing systems, point-of-sale systems, point-of-service systems and financial transaction information and approval systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |