USPTO serial 74366117
W.I.P.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with W.I.P.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B.G. Horowitz
DOUGLAS LIPSTONE KATZ, HOYT, SEIGEL & KAPORSTE 82011111 SANTA MONICA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | articles of clothing; namely, shirts, blouses, T-shirts, tank tops, tops, vests, sweaters, dresses, skirts, jumpers, jumpsuits, rompers, overalls, jackets, coats, snow suits, sleepwear, boxer shorts, blazers, sports coats, suits, pants, jean, shorts, legging, bottoms, sweatshirts, sweat pants, sweat suits, jogging suits, socks, ties, hats, belts, shoes, boots, sneakers, sandals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 6, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |