USPTO serial 74367433
NEW METHOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW METHOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna L. Berry
DONNA L BERRY YOUNG, MACFARLANE & WOOD3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New Method Dentures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by New Method Dentures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEW METHOD
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |