USPTO serial 74368956
PERSONAL COMMUNICATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERSONAL COMMUNICATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Schaumburg, IL
Schaumburg, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth W. Bolvin
JAMES S PRISTELSKI MOTOROLA, INC1299 E ALGONQUIN RDSCHAUMBURG, IL 60196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radio telephones, radio transceivers, and accessories; namely, microphones, speakers, control units, cases, batteries, battery chargers, and handsets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |