USPTO serial 74371594
XXX-XXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XXX-XXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-601 16 Norrkoping, SE
S-601 16 Norrkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH8110 GATEHOUSE RDSTE 500 EFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations used to treat illness and conditions, namely fatigue, cardio-vascular problems and peridontitis; disinfectants for medical instruments; medical herbal supplements; herbal teas for medical purposes; dietetic food for medically restricted diets; corn plasters; wound dressings; all purpose disinfectant; nutritional supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | WRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |