USPTO serial 74371626
HW HARD WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HW HARD WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely hats, gloves, jackets, shorts, surf trunks, snowboard pants, jeans, shirts, and T-shirts | ABANDONED | Nov 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1997 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |