USPTO serial 74371886
TWO OCEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 1999
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TWO OCEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STELLENBOSCH, ZA
STELLENBOSCH, ZA
Stellenbosch, ZA
Stellenbosch, ZA
Stellenbosch, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Becker
Robert A. Becker Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 W. 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DROSTDY WINES LIMTIED
- Other trademarks owned by DROSTDY WINES (PTY) LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Drostdy Winery Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Drostdy Winery Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Drostdy Winery Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TWO OCEANS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2025 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 11, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 17, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |