Drawing for CTS

USPTO serial 74372266

CTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANVILLE, ANNA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian T. McManus

BRIAN T MCMANUS MUNDT, MACGREGOR, HAPPEL, ET AL4200 FIRST INTERSTATE CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-4082UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications services; namely, data retrieval and processing services for cellular telecommunications billing and monitoring purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 1994ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 1994OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 1994OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 1994OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 28, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance