USPTO serial 74372587
BIG BALLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG BALLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Tighe
WILLIAM D IRONS8895 TWR CTR DR #105SAN DIEGO, CA 92122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | exercise clothing; namely, shorts and shirts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1995 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1994 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |