USPTO serial 74372828
FASHION FOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASHION FOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 2R4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Garrett
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY ST STE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non metallic building materials; namely, shower enclosure doors for tubs and stalls; louver assemblies comprising doorframes, window frames complete with louvered doors and window shutters hinged thereto; doors incorporating louver assemblies, closet doors, interior and exterior shuttered doors; exterior and interior window and door shutters | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation of doors, shutters and room dividers; installation of shower enclosure doors for tubs and stalls | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |