Drawing for MARLENE DIETRICH

USPTO serial 74373630

MARLENE DIETRICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARLENE DIETRICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT, GARBUS, KLEIN & SELZ488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016mounted and unmounted photographs; calendar desk stands; posters; stickers; stationery; namely, stationery files, adhesive tape for stationery or household purposes, writing paper and envelopes; pen and pencil cases; artist materials; namely, paint brushes, paper and palettes; calendars; diaries; book markers; gift wrapping papers; tissue papersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 6, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 1, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 2, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 19, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 4, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance