USPTO serial 74373762
POWER SELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER SELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sea Bright, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Bachman
ROBERT H BACHMAN BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PCSTE 1201900 CHAPEL STNEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in and with vehicles; namely, power steering fluids, brake fluids, windshield washer fluids, anti-freeze and summer coolant formulation, gas treatment additives, gas line anti-freeze additives, hydraulic fluids for general use, transmission fluids, motor oil additives, sealers for motors and transmission, tire repair fluids, degreasing chemicals and starting fluids | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | cleaning preparations for cleaning brake parts, tires, automobile carburetors, fuel injectors and internal combustion engines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |