Drawing for ROTO ALPINE

USPTO serial 74373937

ROTO ALPINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTO ALPINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Friedrich Kueffner

342 MADISON AVESTE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007windows of metalABANDONED—
019windows of glass and/or woodABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 1996EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Mar 27, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance