USPTO serial 74373937
ROTO ALPINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROTO ALPINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
7022 Leinfelden-Echterdingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
342 MADISON AVESTE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |