USPTO serial 74374120
AS SEEN ON TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AS SEEN ON TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry Teitelbaum
PERRY TEITELBAUM GOODMAN & TEITELBAUM26 COURT ST STE 1400BROOKLYN, NY 11242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | cutlery and kitchen hand tools; namely, table knives, forks and spoons, kitchen knives, chef knives, bread knives, slicer knives, utility knives, boning knives, paring knives, filleting knives, steak knives, counter blocks and holders for knives sold as a unit, shears, sharpening steels, serving forks, ling handle forks, pot forks, shredders, graters, non-electric peelers, multi-slicers, cheese slicers, foil cutters, and multi-use hand can openers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |