Drawing for VIA

USPTO serial 74374162

VIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1829379Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 5, 1994
Examiner
GREER, CYNTHIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Langworthy, David E. Weslow, Bradley E. Prendergast, Patricia B. Cunningham, John L. North, Peter G. Pappas, Daniel J. Warren, James H. Johnson, Jr.

Tim Walker6200 S. Quebec StreetSuite 270-AGreenwood Village, CO 80111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016debit cards for gaining access to automatic teller machinesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
036banking services rendered through the provision of a network of automatic teller machinesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 19, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 16, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 28, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 24, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 15, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
May 15, 2003E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 23, 2001PR23RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15—
Feb 12, 2001PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Oct 3, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 5, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 11, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance