USPTO serial 74375133
CHER WORKOUT WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHER WORKOUT WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta L. Cairney
ROBERTA L CAIRNEY FENWICK & W LLP100 THE EMBARCADERO 3RD FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's clothing; namely, T-shirts, shorts, socks, leggings, headbands, wristbands, sweatbands, belts, tights, leotards, jogging suits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sport bras, tops, halters, girdles, pants, jackets, vests, blazers, tank tops, skirts, unitards, body suits, body stockings, overalls, smocks, dresses, bathing suits, bathing caps, robes, and cover-ups, headwear; namely, hats, caps, headbands, bandannas, scarves and visors, and women's hosiery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |