Drawing for FRUITCREME

USPTO serial 74376413

FRUITCREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUITCREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB26TH FL150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fruit based frozen confections and fruit based dessert toppings; fruit purees; jams and fruit jellies; pectin and unsweetened/unflavored gelatin based food stabilizersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 4, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 4, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance